tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2195171778438524822.post4992410324717213450..comments2009-11-14T12:19:01.784-08:00Comments on The Norm: Extracting the Good, But Leaving the Bad: My Search for Valuable Internet Resources on SociologyJLShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12822086681002061831noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2195171778438524822.post-63782048848549898932008-04-02T14:56:00.000-07:002008-04-02T14:56:00.000-07:00Cheers for the plug :) I was wondering what you me...Cheers for the plug :) I was wondering what you meant by me and my compadre not establishing our authority. Is this because we haven't written a short 'about the authors' piece, or that we don't offer enough opinion?<BR/><BR/>Whatever the case I've added you to our blogroll.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2195171778438524822.post-14845765437557600892008-04-01T10:36:00.000-07:002008-04-01T10:36:00.000-07:00JLS,Your post offered nine noteworthy sociology we...JLS,<BR/>Your post offered nine noteworthy sociology websites, each of them different but all were highly informative. Although, I would have liked to have see SocioSite only once; instead of adding a link to the same website twice under different names, you could have pointed out both pages with only one link, and added another website. I liked the fact that you mentioned using Sociosite yourself and I believe that served as a strong point on your post. You did a good job of describing each site and blog and as I clicked on the link I believed you description was accurate, though I believed your transitions could have been better by comparing the site with another instead of just starting the sentence with a new post. It is unfortunate that the majority of websites did not offer any interaction because it can be such a useful component to any site. I also would have liked to have seen a graphic in your post of a site of a blog you particularly liked. I believe that this would have greatly added to the post, and would have helped draw the eye in. I thought that that you should have left VALPO to the end since it was your favorite website, like the saying goes 'save the best for last.' I appreciated that you mentioned your previous post, however I believe you could have benefited from a longer closing statement. Overall it was a good post, and I believed you did a wonderful job of using the Webby awards and IMSA criteria.KChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07955483859958120169noreply@blogger.com